Armed conflict between a state and a non-state entity. Armed conflict between competing factions within a country, or between a government and a competing group within that country over control of territory and/or the government. Armed conflict between two or more states. It is difficult to resolve this conflict because both options include getting something, but losing something else. Organized, violent (i.e., military) conflict between two or more parties. This conflict be resolved by, for example, choosing one of the options now, but already determining that next time we are in the same situation we will choose the other. The second option is attractive because it involves traveling to a new place, but it is with people we see more often then our family. The first option is attractive because it involves spending time with family we have not seen for a while, but it does not involve traveling to a new location. In the east African nation of Somalia, the lack of a central government authority led to military intervention by the United Nations in the 1990s. For example, if we have to choose whether to travel home to holidays and spend time with family (which we have not seen for a long time and probably will not be able to see in near future because of work or college) or travel somewhere with friends from work or college (which we more often, but will also not be able to travel with for a long time if we do not do it now). This is a conflict between two options both of which are attractive and repelling to us. The most common conflict situation is probably double approach-avoidance conflict \textbf double approach-avoidance conflict. sig: it creates a great likelihood of arms races that will natively manifest into conflicts due to the states looking to compete against each other for specific.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |